A Los Angeles-area lawmaker trying to help raise money to delete the state government's $8 billion shortfall thinks consumers should pay sales tax when buying from online music stores.
Some avid iTunes users not to mention other state legislators and tax regulators disagree.
"I think he's wrong he should go find money somewhere else," said Fabiola Rojas, a 27-year-old graphic designer in Mountain View. "What iTunes charges now is enough."
The proposal by Assemblyman Charles Calderon, D-City of Industry, doesn't seek to directly tax music tracks, but insteadwould require the Board of Equalization to change a 75-year-old law that authorizes sales tax collections on tangible personal property.
Music, books and videos downloaded off the Internet aren't now considered tangible goods.
"The notion of taxing tangible, physical property is really an industrial-era construct when we made widgets and sold widgets," Calderon said Friday. "Now it's not about widgets, it's about information, and selling information and moving information."
If Calderon prevails, the 8.25 percent to 8.75 percent sales-tax rates in effect in most of the Bay Area would raise the cost of that 99-cent download to $1.07 or $1.08.
But his measure is being soundly criticized by Republicans who are opposed to any kind of tax increases to solve the deficit problem.
It's unclear how much money the download tax would generate.
The Board of Equalization believes state and local revenues would increase by about $114 million a year, but Calderon's estimate, which he said includes pornography downloads, is about $500 million.
Assembly Bill 1956 comes at a time when Apple reports that its iTunes store has leap-frogged Wal-Mart to become the top music retailer in the U.S. with more than 4 billion downloads sold.
Apple has not taken a position on the legislation, a spokesman said.
The measure moves to a tax and revenue committee hearing April 14, but already some members of the Board of Equalization, the regional commission that administers the state's tax programs, have denounced it.
By seeking to make the board redefine downloads as tangible property, member Michelle Steel said, transactions would be subjected to an automatic tax not authorized by the Legislature, which could invite a legal challenge. Under current law, taxes proposed in the Legislature can be raised only with a two-thirds vote of the Senate and Assembly, which is nearly impossible because of Republican resistance.
"When you charge these taxes, all these e-commerces are going to move outside of California," predicted Steel, a Republican from Orange County. "California is the high-tech state, why would you want to kick them out?"
Bay Area board member Betty Yee, a Democrat, opposes the measure, saying any increase in revenue would have a minimal effect on the deficit. She also believes online piracy would increase if legal downloads were taxed.
Calderon acknowledged that his measure, if passed into law, can wind up in court, but he's confident the tax would be deemed legal. He also acknowledged the possibility that some companies may leave California, but said he's committed this year to finding new sources of revenue.
Contact Edwin Garcia at email@example.com or 916-441-4651.